· Rogerian argument - definition Simply put, a Rogerian argument is a negotiation technique in which common viewpoints and goals are identified. Opposing views and plans are also recognized, and using a logical approach, common ground is reached to resolve those differences and reach an agreement In the introduction to a Rogerian argument, the writer presents the problem, typically pointing out how both writer and reader are affected by the problem. Rather than presenting an issue that divides reader and writer, or a thesis that demands agreement (and in effect can be seen as an attack on a reader who holds an opposing view), the Rogerian argument does not begin The Rogerian style of argument emphasizes persuasion with respect for the opposition as opposed to proving the point with evidence and confrontation. Persuasion: The object of a Rogerian style argument is to convince the opposition about the merits of your argument, to help them understand your point of view and lead them toward support for your conclusions
What is Rogerian Argument? (Kiefer)
This page is brought rogerian argument definition you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, rogerian argument definition, you must include the entire legal notice, rogerian argument definition. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission, rogerian argument definition.
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use. The Rogerian argument or Rogerian rhetoric is a form of argumentative reasoning that aims to establish a middle ground between parties with opposing viewpoints or goals. For example, rogerian argument definition, if you wanted to watch a comedy and your friend wanted to watch a romance, you might compromise by offering to watch a rom-com, rogerian argument definition, as this offers each of you a bit of what you are looking for in that particular moment.
Note, however, rogerian argument definition this style of argument is decidedly less common in academic settings, where various empirical or theoretical notions of truth are often prized above the practical advantages of the Rogerian method. While Aristotelian styles of argument are often seen as eristic concerned primarily with winningthe Rogerian argument can be viewed as more dialectic in nature a conversation between two or more parties with the goal of arriving at some mutually-satisfying solution.
Thus, practicing the Rogerian argument will enhance your ability to understand the complex relations of opposing viewpoints and provide tools for addressing such discrepancies sympathetically. However, Rogerian argument does come with disadvantages, rogerian argument definition. For example, because Rogerian argument relies on compromise between opposing parties, it may not work well when your opponents are unwilling or unable to compromise, or if they are arguing in bad faith e.
The first aim shows the reader that you understand the complexities of the argument and that you have listened sympathetically to what it is they have to say. This is important, because the success of the Rogerian arguments relies on cooperation and collaboration. The second aim puts this understanding into practice by seeking a symbiotic solution, rogerian argument definition. The third aim builds ethos and rapport between the parties.
If audiences believe they share a value system with a speaker or writer, they are more likely to rogerian argument definition to the terms of whatever solution is presented. While each of these aims is important, Young, Becker, and Pike stress that they are just that: aims, not steps. You should not necessarily view these aims as occurring in a linear, step-by-step process. The authors present a synthesized discussion of what a successful Rogerian argument should contain, but they eschew any formalized structure.
The structure of the argument should instead be determined by the speaker, and it should be modified and adapted according to the rhetorical situation at hand.
Again, there is no formalized structure for the Rogerian argument, though the following example provides a foundation for considering how you might structure your own argument. In this example, we will take the position that technology e.
In so doing, we should be able to arrive at a solution that considers both arguments and develops a solution that benefits both parties while still achieving our goal of allowing technology in the classroom. Here, we would introduce the topic and briefly discuss why it is a matter of contention. We would lay out the differing perspectives, briefly mention the merits of each argument, and discuss the implications closely considering all perspectives to arrive at a solution that works for everyone.
Here, we would introduce the opposing position that digital technology should not be allowed in the writing classroom. We would also list and discuss their objections to the proposition of technology in the classroom. Here we might provide specific details that rogerian argument definition merit to their argument. We want to show that we are fully considering their claims and not just giving lip service, in the hope that that they will give similar value to our opinions.
We could include statistics, testimony from instructors and students, or even examples from media that support their theory that digital technology can indeed be a distraction during instruction. Here, we would introduce our claim that digital technology should be rogerian argument definition in the writing classroom. We would still want to speak as objectively as possible in order to establish our ethos as concerned but unbiased speaker.
We might even qualify our position by acknowledging that there are, of course, situations in which technology should be put away, but reiterate that, generally speaking, the presence of digital technology is a positive.
For example, we could gather testimony from students who claim that using these technologies in class has been beneficial. We could include research and scholarship that supports our position and even quote instructors who have developed pedagogy around these technologies.
We might even subtly demonstrate that our opposition has failed to account for all possibilities by choosing our examples carefully, rogerian argument definition. For instance, we could easily include accounts of students with learning disabilities who might otherwise have a difficult time succeeding in class without the help of assistive technologies. We would acknowledge that some instructors do not want digital technologies present in the classroom, as they believe they distract from paying attention during lectures.
We would maintain, however, that these technologies can indeed be productive tools for learning—in some cases, they can even be a virtual requirement for learning.
We could then offer a solution: that these digital technologies should be kept aside during lecture portions of a lesson except in the case of students with documented disabilities. This way, students will likely be paying attention, taking notes by hand which they can transcribe later if they so wish.
However, once a class moves from lecture to activity whether group or individualstudents should be allowed to access these technologies to more effectively engage with the activity, organize their thoughts, and access information.
Now that the instructor is no longer lecturing, it should be rogerian argument definition to monitor student progress and engagement and the use of technology rogerian argument definition these activities will lead to more developed and better organized results from the students. Find Info For Find Info For Academics Admissions Current Students Athletics About Careers Prospective Students Research and Partnerships Quick Links Apply News President Shop Visit Give Emergency.
Purdue Online Writing Lab College of Liberal Arts. Writing Lab Purdue OWL Research Contact Site Map. General Writing Academic Writing Historical Perspectives on Argumentation. Welcome to the Purdue OWL This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. Rogerian Argument The Rogerian rogerian argument definition or Rogerian rhetoric is a form of argumentative reasoning that aims to establish a middle ground between parties with opposing viewpoints or goals.
Contents Again, there is rogerian argument definition formalized structure for the Rogerian argument, though the following example provides a foundation for considering how you might structure your own argument, rogerian argument definition. Introduction Here, we would introduce the topic and briefly discuss why it is a matter of contention. Opposing position Here, we would introduce the opposing position that digital technology should not be allowed in the writing classroom.
Context for opposing position Here we might provide specific details that lend merit to their argument. Rogerian argument definition Position Here, we would introduce our claim that digital technology should be allowed in the writing classroom.
Rogerian Argument �� What Is It ❓ Topics ❗ Rogerian Essay Example ��
, time: 1:15Rogerian Argument - Definition and Introduction | blogger.com
The Rogerian style of argument emphasizes persuasion with respect for the opposition as opposed to proving the point with evidence and confrontation. Persuasion: The object of a Rogerian style argument is to convince the opposition about the merits of your argument, to help them understand your point of view and lead them toward support for your conclusions · Rogerian argument - definition Simply put, a Rogerian argument is a negotiation technique in which common viewpoints and goals are identified. Opposing views and plans are also recognized, and using a logical approach, common ground is reached to resolve those differences and reach an agreement A Rogerian argument is also called the "common ground" argument because this method requires you to identify the ideas, beliefs and arguments you and your audience share in common. The assumption, therefore, is that you and your intended audience share common ideas, beliefs and arguments. Hence, the task is to identify these commonalities and use them File Size: 9KB
No comments:
Post a Comment